Broadway, From Duane
Street To Canal Street Pages:
572-604
This section of Broadway is not
the less interesting from its
association with what has been
supposed with some reason to
have been the site of an Indian
village at some distant period
of the past. This supposition
arises principally from the name
originally bestowed by the
Christian settlers upon the
hilly promontory extending into
the surrounding meadows, viz.:
"The Kalckhook," or lime shell
point, a name which would hardly
have been applied without a
local signification.
The fact is generally conceded
that an extensive cretaceous
deposit indicates the site of an
aboriginal settlement; and this,
in connection with the vicinity
of the hill to an inviting sheet
of water, well supplied with
fish, which stretched along its
eastern boundary, has added
probability to the conjecture.
It is to be observed, however,
that no record exists indicating
a settlement of the Indians in
this locality, in the times of
the early Christian colonists;
nor had this vicinity as had
some others on the island
(Sapokanican, Mereckawich, and a
few others), any distinct native
title, which has been handed
down to us and we are thus
thrown back in our speculations
on this subject to the remote
times where the history of our
island is hidden within the
darkness surrounding the nomadic
and untraditional ages of the
aborigines.
The Kalckhook commenced at a
vale near the present line of
Duane street, and rose gradually
to an elevation of forty to
fifty feet above the surrounding
meadows; on its summit, a little
pond of an acre or more in size
appears indicated on some of the
early maps. Its extent embraces
about forty acres, the whole of
which as granted by Governor
Kieft to Jan Damen, in the year
1646. Some forty years
subsequently it came to be the
property of four owners, who
made partition of it, though it
still laid in common and the
public pound was established on
its summit. One of these
portions was assigned to Jacobus
Van Cortland, the most of which
remained in the family of that
name for over a century, as will
be noticed in tracing its
subsequent history. The westerly
half, another portion, came into
the possession of Anthony
Rutgers, a leading citizen of
New York, who, about the year
1730, erected there a handsome
residence, and occupied the
premises until his death, some
twenty years afterwards. He
surrounded his habitation with
elegant shrubbery in the
geometrical style of rural
gardening of those days. Long
walks bordered with box-wood,
and shaded and perfumed with
flowering shrubs, extended in
various directions in the
parterre, fronting the house.
The favorite orchard extended
along the southerly side of the
mansion, while the pasture lands
and cultivated fields extended
toward the north. It was a
charming rural residence, and
even in after years, when its
quiet and domestic
characteristics had given place
tot he festive incidents
attached to a public resort, the
advertisement of the proprietor
expressed it as judged to be the
most rural and pleasing retreat
near the city.
The fashion of the last century
led idlers and pleasure-seekers
to suburban places of amusement,
where music, dancing, and
feasting contributed their share
in the amusements of the hour.
The names of Ranelagh and
Vauxhall, near London, are
familiar even to the modern
American reader, as the
literature of the last century
popularized those resorts of the
idle and gay of London society.
Their glories found imitators
throughout all parts of the
British dominions, and new York
had both a Vauxhall, and
Ranelagh; the latter of which
was the former residence and
garden of Col. Rutgers. This
establishment was conducted
under the auspices of Mr. John
Jones for some years immediately
previous to the revolutionary
war. His advertisements describe
the place as being laid out at
great expense, with all
conveniences for breakfasting,
and every entertainment for
ladies and gentlemen. A complete
band was in attendance every
Monday and Thursday evening
during the summer, in a large
dancing hall, which had been
erected in the garden. The
Rutgers' estate was brought into
the market for sale in 1770, and
the first sale was to an
association organized for the
establishment of a hospital, an
institution until then unknown
in New York. It was at first
proposed to erect the building
in the Park, but, as has been
elsewhere stated, that project
was abandoned, and the site
fixed upon was Rutgers' orchard.
The hospital was chartered in
1769. Funds were subscribed in
1771, and the city corporation
added L1,000 to the contribution
in lieu of the land which had
been previously set apart for
this edifice. Five acres were
purchased in 1772, and the
building was commenced September
2, 1773. The cost of the
building was about $18,000. In
1775 it was partly destroyed by
an accidental fire; it was,
however, sufficiently repaired
to serve as barracks for the
British soldiers during the war.
Some years after the return of
peace it was reopened as a
hospital. The inadequate funds
arising from private
subscription were from time to
time aided by legislative
action, and the institution
still remains, with some
additions to the original
structure, and is distinguished
as one of the most beneficent as
well as the most ancient of the
benevolent enterprises organized
by the citizens of New York.
The principal historical
incident connected with the New
York Hospital was the "Doctors'
riot," in 1788, which originated
from the violent prejudices then
existing against the practice of
exhuming bodies for dissection.
In Great Britain a class of
persons had grown up profanely
called resurrectionists, who
supplied the medical schools
with bodies, often it was said
those of respectable persons
recently interred. The stories,
perhaps exaggerated, occasioned
great popular prejudice against
the medical colleges, which in
New York was exasperated by the
indiscretion of students who
wantonly exposed the legs and
arms of their subjects dangling
from the hospital windows. The
populace took fire at this
inhuman exhibition, and a riot
occurred in which several lives
were lost.
The erection of a reservoir for
supplying the city with pure
water was the next event of
historical importance in
connection with this portion of
the city. The subject had long
been agitated, and the necessity
of some relief was becoming more
manifest as the city increased
and prospered. The public wells
in the streets of the city
supplied water of brackish
taste, which horses, unless
accustomed to it, would not
touch. This was ascribed to the
narrow width of the island at
the lower portion, which did not
permit sufficient filtration of
the salt water of the rivers;
but several of the wells in the
vicinity of the Kalckhook pond
supplied excellent water, and
thence the inhabitants of the
city were daily furnished with
their "tea water." From this
arose the project of sinking
large wells and pumping the
water into an extensive
reservoir whence it might be
carried through the city in
wooden pipes. The elevated hill
through which Broadway (then
Great George street) was
designed to run was fixed upon
for the purpose, and in 1774 the
city authorities purchased lands
of A. & F. Van Cortland at L600
per acre. The work was commenced
under the supervision of
Christopher Colles, one of the
earliest professional engineers
established in the city, good
water reported as being found in
the wells. The reservoir was
completed and wooden pipes were
laid through the streets. The
first contract for the latter
being for 60,000 feet, at a cost
of L1,250. The work was
completed about April, 1776. The
reservoir stood on the east side
of Broadway, near the
southeasterly corner of the
present White street and
Broadway. It is to be
remembered, however, that this
was many years before streets
were cut through in that
vicinity.
As to the history of the
reservoir during the occupancy
by the British, which took place
a few months after its
completion, and continued till
1783, we have no positive
knowledge, but it is believed
that it was not used during that
period, and probably proved to
be inadequate to its objects, as
we find the Manhattan company,
which was subsequently organized
for the purpose of supplying the
city with pure and wholesome
water, petitioning the city in
1799 for permission to occupy
the former reservoir until it
could be ascertained if the
water should prove to be of
sufficient quality and quantity
to supply the city. Their
petition was granted, but from
the fact that the company soon
after established their works in
another locality, it is inferred
that the original site was not
approved. The property of the
Corporation at the reservoir,
Broadway and White streets, was
sold in lots in 1810; those on
Broadway selling as high as an
average of $3,000 each. The
total sale amounted to $25,500.
Continue on Page: 2