The presidential election of 1876 remains one of the most contested and controversial elections in American history. It pitted Rutherford B. Hayes, the Republican candidate, against Samuel J. Tilden, the Democratic candidate, in a race that was marked by widespread allegations of electoral fraud, intense political maneuvering, and a resolution that shaped the future of American politics.
The Political Climate of the 1870s
The 1870s were a tumultuous time in American history. The nation was still reeling from the Civil War’s aftermath, and the Reconstruction era was marked by significant political, social, and economic challenges. Reconstruction policies, aimed at integrating the Southern states back into the Union and ensuring rights for newly freed African Americans, were highly contentious and deeply polarizing.
The Republican Party, which had led the Union during the Civil War and spearheaded Reconstruction, faced growing opposition from Southern Democrats who were determined to end federal intervention in their states. This political climate set the stage for the fiercely contested election of 1876.
The Candidates: Rutherford B. Hayes and Samuel J. Tilden
Rutherford B. Hayes, the Republican candidate, was a former governor of Ohio and a Union Army veteran. He was known for his integrity and moderate views, which made him a palatable choice for a party seeking to maintain its hold on power during a period of growing discontent.
Samuel J. Tilden, the Democratic candidate, was the governor of New York and a successful lawyer known for his efforts to combat corruption, notably his role in dismantling the notorious Tweed Ring in New York City. Tilden’s reformist credentials and appeal to Southern Democrats made him a strong contender in the race.
The Election: A Contentious Campaign
The 1876 presidential campaign was marked by heated rhetoric and fierce competition. Both candidates focused on key issues of the day, including corruption, economic recovery, and the future of Reconstruction. Tilden campaigned on a platform of reform and ending the corruption associated with the Grant administration, while Hayes emphasized the need for national unity and the continued support of Reconstruction efforts.
The results were initially unclear on Election Day, November 7, 1876. Tilden won the popular vote significantly, receiving approximately 250,000 more votes than Hayes. However, the outcome of the Electoral College was far from decided. To win the presidency, a candidate needed 185 electoral votes. Tilden had secured 184, just one vote short of victory, while Hayes had 165. Twenty electoral votes from four states—Florida, Louisiana, South Carolina, and Oregon—were disputed.
The Dispute: Allegations and Investigations
The disputed electoral votes led to allegations of fraud, intimidation, and corruption from both sides. In the South, where Reconstruction governments were still in power, there were claims of voter suppression and intimidation of African American voters, who largely supported the Republicans. Conversely, Democrats accused Republicans of manipulating the vote counts in these states to favor Hayes.
With no clear winner, the nation was plunged into a constitutional crisis. Congress established a bipartisan Electoral Commission in January 1877 to resolve the impasse. The commission comprised 15 members: five from the House of Representatives, five from the Senate, and five from the Supreme Court. Initially, the commission was balanced with seven Democrats, seven Republicans, and one independent justice, David Davis. However, Davis was unexpectedly elected to the Senate and replaced by Justice Joseph P. Bradley, a Republican, tipping the balance in favor of the Republicans.
The Electoral Commission: A Controversial Resolution
The Electoral Commission’s deliberations were highly contentious. Each disputed state’s electoral votes were examined, and arguments were presented by both parties. The commission ultimately decided along party lines, awarding all 20 disputed electoral votes to Hayes. This decision gave Hayes the necessary 185 electoral votes to win the presidency despite losing the popular vote.
The decision was formalized through a series of votes in Congress, with the final resolution reached in the early hours of March 2, 1877, just days before the inauguration. Hayes was declared the winner and sworn in as the 19th President of the United States on March 4, 1877.
Prices pulled from the Amazon Product Advertising API on:
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on [relevant Amazon Site(s), as applicable] at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.
**As an Amazon affiliate, The History Box may earn a commission from purchases through this link.**
The Compromise of 1877
The resolution of the 1876 election is often called the Compromise of 1877. While there was no formal written agreement, it is widely believed that an informal deal was struck between the Republicans and Southern Democrats to secure Hayes’s presidency. In exchange for their acceptance of Hayes as president, the Republicans agreed to withdraw federal troops from the Southern states, effectively ending Reconstruction.
This compromise had significant and lasting consequences. The removal of federal troops allowed Southern Democrats to regain control of their state governments, leading to the disenfranchisement and segregation of African Americans through Jim Crow laws. The end of Reconstruction marked the beginning of a long period of racial discrimination and violence in the South.
The Legacy of the 1876 Election
The disputed election of 1876 and its resolution had profound implications for American politics and race relations. The Compromise of 1877 effectively abandoned the federal commitment to protecting the rights of African Americans, leading to nearly a century of segregation and disenfranchisement in the South.
The election also highlighted the flaws and vulnerabilities in the American electoral system. The controversy underscored the need for clear procedures for resolving disputed elections. It led to the passage of the Electoral Count Act of 1887, which aimed to clarify the process for counting electoral votes and resolving disputes.